![]() |
|
|||||
Who is it good for? This is a book for those who would like to improve their understanding of the middlegame.
The Good Things:
· Written by three renown writers, two of whom (Keres and Kotov) were world class players · The 5th chapter, the one about analysis, though talking about the obsolete phenomenon of adjourned games contains some deep and fascinating analysis by Keres
The Bad Things:
· The material is outdated, especially the chapter about planning and the one about pawn formations in the center · The book uses descriptive notation · On every subject of the book there are many books in the market today that cover it more thoroughly
Quote: “That the subject is a difficult one appears from the comparative scarcity of books on the middle game. Books on the opening abound; nor are books on the end game wanting, but those on the middle game can be counted on the fingers of one hand.”
The Bottom Line: As you can see from the above quote the book was published in a different era (1964). All three contributors have written great books but “The Art of the Middle Game”, apart from chapter 5, does not pass the test of time.
Rating: 7/10 Review written by Chessbug. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
© All Rights Reserved to Chessbug 2006